Onsite Cost – Comparison Between Onsite vs Remote 2024–2026

Evaluating onsite costs during the 2024–2026 period has become an important part of business operational strategy, especially as the labor market fluctuates and flexible working trends become increasingly common. Changes in working models place businesses in front of a major question: Is onsite still the optimal choice, or are remote costs becoming a new competitive advantage? Comparing the two models within the same economic and technological context helps businesses make decisions aligned with long-term growth objectives.

>>> Learn more: Which industries are suitable for onsite, and which are suitable for remote?  

Onsite costs and rising operational expenses in the 2024–2026 period

When analyzing onsite costs, businesses need to consider many factors such as office expenses, infrastructure, equipment, human resource management, and mandatory benefits. These factors are expected to continue increasing during the 2024–2026 period due to rising rental prices and requirements to upgrade working environments to meet new safety and security standards. For long-term projects, total onsite costs often increase significantly, directly impacting budgets and profit margins.

For industries such as banking, telecommunications, or projects requiring high security, maintaining the onsite model remains mandatory. However, businesses must carefully weigh operating costs against the value delivered, especially as technical resources become increasingly expensive.

Comparing onsite costs and remote costs – Which model is more cost-efficient?

While onsite costs continue to rise, many businesses are shifting to the remote model thanks to significant reductions in facility-related expenses, utilities, equipment, and office space. Remote costs are not only lower in operational terms but also expand recruitment reach, enabling businesses to access suitable talent in provincial areas where average salaries are lower than in major cities.

Although remote costs offer clear advantages, businesses must still account for remote management expenses such as monitoring software, security systems, collaboration tools, and training. For projects with clear processes, stable Agile practices, and minimal need for direct interaction, remote delivers substantial savings. Conversely, projects requiring tight control or complex workflows remain better suited to the onsite model.

The shift from onsite to remote during the 2024–2026 period

Global trends show that businesses are shifting from onsite to remote-first or hybrid-first models to optimize costs and enhance recruitment capability. When evaluating onsite costs in the context of IT talent shortages, businesses realize that more flexible models deliver stronger long-term efficiency.

From 2024 to 2026, many technology companies, e-commerce businesses, and startups prioritize remote costs to reduce financial pressure while maintaining product development speed. However, projects with high security requirements or intensive collaboration demands continue to retain onsite as a strategic choice.

Are onsite costs still the optimal choice?

When consolidating operational, workforce, and performance factors, onsite cost becomes a central consideration for businesses choosing the appropriate model. Onsite remains a strong option for high-security projects or those requiring close collaboration, but in many cases, remote costs provide clear advantages in budget efficiency and team scalability. Businesses must carefully evaluate each project to optimize costs during the 2024–2026 period.

>>> Learn more: Detailed analysis of the onsite model – Advantages and disadvantages by project type

Consultation on optimizing onsite and remote costs

Is your business evaluating onsite costs and choosing the most efficient working model? 
HRI Vietnam is ready to advise on operational strategies aligned with budget constraints and growth objectives.

Customer support: hr@hri.com.vn
Hotline: 024 7300 6665