Doanh nghiệp Việt Nam đang sử dụng dịch vụ Headhunter như thế nào?
The domino effect in organizations can start from a single vacant position, leading to staff overload, operational disruptions, and increased risks. This article analyzes the causes, impacts, and solutions to help businesses manage human resource risks sustainably.
In human resource management, many companies often view a vacant position as a temporary issue that can be handled gradually. However, in reality, a vacancy that is not filled in time can trigger a domino effect within the organization, creating a chain reaction that impacts people, processes, and overall business performance.
This article will analyze what the domino effect is, why it occurs when a position remains vacant, the impacts and consequences businesses must face, and what solutions can help control this risk in a sustainable way.
The domino effect in an organization refers to a phenomenon where an initial issue - seemingly small and localized - triggers a chain reaction affecting multiple individuals, departments, and processes. In human resource management, an unfilled position is often the first domino, leading to workforce overload, workflow disruption, declining morale, and ultimately a direct impact on business performance.
The defining characteristic of the domino effect is that its impact does not stop at the vacant role but spreads across the organization’s operational chain. The longer the vacancy persists, the more these consequences overlap, making the situation harder to control and significantly increasing the cost of recovery.

One of the most common reasons a vacancy triggers a domino effect is the absence of a workforce contingency plan. When an employee leaves unexpectedly, the organization becomes reactive, forcing teams to temporarily redistribute tasks without a clear replacement strategy. The lack of ready successors or a pre-built talent pipeline causes the vacancy to persist, placing continuous pressure on operational systems.
Many organizations still rely on traditional recruitment processes that involve multiple approval layers and long decision-making cycles. When hiring timelines are extended, a vacancy stops being a short-term issue and turns into a prolonged bottleneck. During this period, affected departments are forced to self-manage, increasing the risk of errors and reducing overall efficiency.
Not all roles have the same level of impact. Positions that connect workflows, make decisions, or own key deliverables tend to have a much broader influence. When these roles remain unfilled, workflows break down, forcing other departments to adjust their plans and amplifying the domino effect across the organization.
When a position remains vacant, the workload does not disappear, it is redistributed among remaining employees. The resulting pressure pushes individuals to operate beyond capacity for extended periods, leading to fatigue, reduced focus, and declining individual performance. This is often the first and most visible effect of the domino chain.
Handling multiple responsibilities makes it difficult for employees to maintain previous quality standards. Tasks are delayed, decisions slow down, and quality thresholds are often lowered just to keep up with deadlines. These disruptions do not stay within one department but spread across the entire operational chain.
When overload becomes the norm, team morale begins to erode. Employees may feel treated unfairly, underappreciated, and unsupported. This weakens engagement levels and gradually undermines organizational culture.
If pressure persists without resolution, the risk of cascading resignations becomes unavoidable. High-performing employees who usually have more options in the labor market are often the first to leave. This pushes the organization into a worsening cycle of talent shortages.
Beyond direct hiring costs, organizations face hidden expenses such as productivity loss, management time spent on damage control, and missed business opportunities. These costs are difficult to measure immediately but significantly impact long-term profitability and competitiveness.
Organizations that constantly struggle with understaffing, overload, and high turnover gradually lose credibility in the eyes of job seekers. Negative employee experiences spread through informal channels, making future talent attraction increasingly difficult.
Organizations must view vacancies not merely as HR problems but as operational risks. Monitoring critical roles, forecasting turnover, and preparing replacement scenarios help reduce the impact of unexpected changes.
To prevent vacancies from lingering, organizations should optimize hiring speed by expanding their candidate sourcing channels. Combining internal referrals, recruitment collaborators, and multi-channel recruitment platforms helps shorten time-to-fill and stop the domino chain before it escalates.
During periods of understaffing, closely tracking workload levels and team morale is critical. Flexible task allocation, resource prioritization, and timely support allow organizations to maintain stability and prevent cascading consequences.
>>> Read more: Recland – HRI Vietnam’s smart multi-industry recruitment platform
The domino effect in organizations rarely originates from major disruptions; more often, it begins with a single vacant position that is underestimated. When organizations respond slowly, a minor issue can quickly escalate into a systemic risk affecting people, processes, and performance. Conversely, when vacancies are identified early, their root causes understood, and proactive solutions implemented, organizations can effectively contain the impact, safeguard productivity, and maintain long-term workforce stability.